Catalog ads can run video now. Here's why that matters more than it sounds.
Something just changed in one of the most-used formats in performance advertising. Catalog ads, the feed-driven workhorse that quietly powers most of digital commerce, can now run video.
You decide, per campaign, whether a feed stays image-only or brings video into the mix, and video-based catalog ads run right alongside your static ones. The dynamic logic that has always matched the right product to the right shopper doesn't change. What changes is what it can serve: motion, where it used to be locked to a single flat frame.
Zuuvi has recently developed the possibility to create video catalog ads.
Book a demo to learn more.
To see why this matters, it helps to remember why catalog ads won in the first place.
The genius of the catalog ad was never the creative. It was the logic. Match demand to inventory, automatically, at a scale no team could manage by hand. A retailer with 10,000 products couldn't brief 10,000 ads, so the catalog did it for them: one feed in, thousands of personalised, dynamically assembled ads out.
Catalog automation is what made performance advertising affordable for anyone selling more than a handful of things.
But that automation came with a constraint baked in. To assemble an ad on the fly for any product in a feed, the creative had to be simple, predictable, and cheap to produce at volume. A single flat image per product fit perfectly. Video didn't. So the format that reached the most shoppers ended up carrying the least ambitious creative, and everyone quietly accepted the trade.
For years that trade was fine, because the feed around those ads was mostly static too. A still product ad sat comfortably next to still posts and still photos. It blended in, and blending in was enough.
Then attention moved to motion.
Roughly 95% of time on the meta platforms is now spent on short-form video.
The feed is no longer a place people read, it's a place people watch.
Scroll behaviour has been retrained around movement: the eye stops for motion and slides past everything that holds still. A static product ad in a video feed isn't neutral anymore. It's the one frame that signals "skip me."
The performance data has caught up to the behaviour. Meta reports up to 87% better click-through rates and up to 48% higher conversion rates for catalog campaigns running product video versus static images. Consistent video exposure drives up to 3x higher brand recall.
Those aren't marginal gains you optimise toward over a quarter. That's the format working as intended versus the format quietly losing the auction for attention.
And that's the part worth sitting with. Static campaigns keep running, budgets keep spending, dashboards keep reporting numbers that look fine in isolation. The cost shows up as the gap between what your catalog earns and what it could earn if it were built for the feed people actually use.
It's the most expensive kind of underperformance, because it never announces itself.
If video wins, why has almost all catalog advertising stayed flat?
Because the original constraint never went away. Video is harder and more expensive to produce than a photo, and a catalog demands creative at a scale.
That's the honest tension. Everyone knows video performs. Everyone also knows what it costs to make. But for the brands who have the economy and resources for it, video catalog ads can be the real differentiator.
Have the resources? Book a demo to learn more about how you can get started with video catalog ads.
So return to the shift, now that the stakes are clear.
What's changed is that the format finally has a door for it. The same dynamic logic that has always matched products to shoppers can now carry motion into the feed, at the volume the catalog was always good at.
That sounds like a small mechanical change. It isn't. It collapses a trade-off that has shaped performance advertising for a decade.
For marketing leaders, that reframes the catalog from a maintenance line item into a growth surface. The format you've been running on autopilot is suddenly your largest untapped opportunity for the creative that actually moves numbers. For the people making the work, it means their best motion gets the widest possible reach instead of dying in a single campaign. Same craft, a far bigger stage.
The catalog ad isn't going anywhere. The logic that made it powerful, matching demand to inventory automatically at scale, is as valuable as it has ever been. What's dying is the assumption bolted onto it: that catalog and static are the same thing, that the workhorse format has to wear the plainest creative in the feed.
That assumption made sense in a static internet. In a feed built on motion, it's a slow leak in your performance.
The brands that treat video as a catalog capability rather than a luxury will be the ones whose feeds still stop the scroll a year from now.
The rest will keep running ads that technically work, in a feed that has quietly stopped watching them.
Attention has already made its choice. The only real question is whether your catalog is built for the feed people scroll today, or the one they scrolled in 2016.
Meta performance figures reflect Meta-reported benchmarks for catalog campaigns using video versus static creative; results vary by advertiser, vertical, and campaign setup.
Zuuvi is a Creative Infrastructure Platform. Learn more here.